The one who prepares it
Days of gathering and formatting become a morning of checking. The work moves from assembling numbers to explaining them – which is the part the job was posted for.
Management reporting
Automating a management report is not typing faster. It is figures read straight out of their sources, definitions that survive from one month to the next, and a send-out that is a date in the calendar rather than whenever the last workbook arrives.
30 days free · No credit card required
The reporting cycle
Each source is read where it lives: the sales database, the accounting service, the ticket system, the campaign accounts. Anything without its own connector comes in over a database view, an ODBC connection or an export to CSV or Excel that lands in the same place on the same day. Nobody chases a colleague for a file.
The sources meet in a single model, so “order” means the same thing whether it came from the CRM or the invoicing side. That definition is written once and applies to every period after it – which is what makes two months comparable in the first place.
A figure without a sentence next to it gets explained again in the meeting. The commentary belongs to the period it describes, so it has to be written against a fixed state – a saved view with the month set, or the export you release. A board that always shows “now” has no March to comment on.
The pack leaves as a scheduled email, as an export for the people who want a file, and as a link for everyone who would rather click into the detail. A threshold alert reaches whoever needs to know before the date. How all of that is set up is on the collaboration page.
What you released stays exactly as released. The live view keeps moving with the data, the released version does not, and both are kept: one to work with, one to point at when somebody asks what you actually said in May.
Who notices
Days of gathering and formatting become a morning of checking. The work moves from assembling numbers to explaining them – which is the part the job was posted for.
The pack is there on the agreed date, in the same structure as last time. A figure that gets questioned in the room is opened and drilled into instead of being written down for the next meeting.
A department head answers with a link to the same state everyone else is looking at, not a screenshot pasted into an email. The conversation is about the decision, not about where the number came from.
Asked in the first meeting
No, and that is not the goal. Collecting, calculating, formatting and sending are automated. The judgement – why contribution margin fell in the north region – is still written by a person, but now against figures that are already settled.
Then the route is the database underneath it: a view on SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, Oracle or SQLite, an ODBC connection, or a scheduled export to CSV or Excel that lands in the same folder every period. The report reads it from there, so no one is copying rows by hand.
It stays with March, provided the period was fixed before it was written – a released export or a saved view with the month set. That is the practical difference between a report and a dashboard: a report is a statement about a closed period.
Whatever went out as a PDF or an Excel file stays readable as it was sent, regardless of how the source behind it has changed since. Alongside it sits the live view showing today. Both are worth keeping; they should not be confused with each other.
No. The usual path is one sheet first – often the revenue and order overview – with the rest following over the next cycles. Every page that comes out of the tool is a page nobody rebuilds by hand next period.
We go through it sheet by sheet: what already has a source behind it, what is still assembled by hand, and what the next period could look like.